Tomster/Pterodactyl-Script
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/tommytran732/Pterodactyl-Script synced 2024-11-08 04:41:33 -05:00
Code

Update README.md

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Tommy 2021-11-02 20:08:54 -04:00 committed by GitHub
parent eb7c3f8710
commit e0d62a4fe2
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
README.md
View File

@ -34,8 +34,10 @@ Ideally, we would want everything to be reproducible from the OS to the Pterodac
# Supported Distributions # Supported Distributions
Fedora, CentOS Stream, RHEL, Rocky Linux, AlmaLinux, Ubuntu, and Debian are currently supported distributions. <br /> Fedora, CentOS Stream, RHEL, Rocky Linux, AlmaLinux, Ubuntu, and Debian are currently supported distributions. <br />
As it currently stands, RHEL is the best distribution for a production system. RHEL and its derivatives have much longer life cycle support (10 years) than Ubuntu LTS (5 years) and Debian (roughly 3 years - not counting Debian LTS), a much better Mandatory Access Control system, and a superior package manager. CentOS Stream is slightly (~1 minor version) ahead of RHEL, so you could expect it to be ever so slightly less stable. Rocky and AlmaLinux are RHEL rebuilds, so they are likely to get security patches after RHEL, just like how the old CentOS was. Red Hat now offers 16 licenses for free for production use, which also comes with Red Hat Insights, and I highly recommend that you choose RHEL over other distributions if possible. I am using RHEL on my personal Pterodactyl instance as well.<br /> As it currently stands, RHEL is the best distribution for a production system. RHEL and its derivatives have much longer life cycle support (10 years) than Ubuntu LTS (5 years) and Debian (roughly 3 years - not counting Debian LTS), a much better Mandatory Access Control system, and a superior package manager. CentOS Stream is slightly (~1 minor version) ahead of RHEL, so you could expect it to be ever so slightly less stable. Rocky and AlmaLinux are RHEL rebuilds, so they are likely to get security patches after RHEL, just like how the old CentOS was. Red Hat now offers 16 licenses for free for production use, which also comes with Red Hat Insights, and I highly recommend that you choose RHEL over other distributions if possible. I am using RHEL on my personal Pterodactyl instance as well.<br />
If you live on the edge and don't mind doing a major OS upgrade every 6 months, then Fedora may be a perfect choice. However, I am not recommending it at the moment as it is probably not what people are looking for and I do not have enough energy to help with issues that may arise from doing in-place OS upgrades. <br /> If you live on the edge and don't mind doing a major OS upgrade every 6 months, then Fedora may be a perfect choice. However, I am not recommending it at the moment as it is probably not what people are looking for and I do not have enough energy to help with issues that may arise from doing in-place OS upgrades. <br />
As for Ubuntu, it is simply supported because it is a popular distribution and a lot of people might feel comfortable with it. That being said, I am not quite sure what the best practices are with Ubuntu at the moment - they seem to be pushing snaps very heavily, to the point where even Certbot and Docker are shipped and recommended as snaps nowadays. For simplicity, the script currently uses .deb packages just like it does with Debian, however this might change in the future if thoose .debs packages are neglected in favor of snaps. I personally would not use Ubuntu unless I have no other choices.
As for Ubuntu, it is simply supported because it is a popular distribution and a lot of people might feel comfortable with it. That being said, I am not quite sure what the best practices are with Ubuntu at the moment - they seem to be pushing snaps very heavily, to the point where even Certbot and Docker are shipped and recommended as snaps nowadays. For simplicity, the script currently uses .deb packages just like it does with Debian, but this might change in the future if thoose .debs packages are neglected in favor of snaps. I personally would not use Ubuntu unless I have no other choices.
| Operating System | Version | Supported | Recommended | Notes | | Operating System | Version | Supported | Recommended | Notes |
| ----------------- | -------- | -------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------ | | ----------------- | -------- | -------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------ |