PrivSec-dev/privsec.dev
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/PrivSec-dev/privsec.dev synced 2024-11-17 12:01:35 -05:00
Code

Update and rename Linux-Desktop-Hardening.md to Desktop-Linux-Hardening.md

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: Tommy <contact@tommytran.io>
This commit is contained in:
Tommy 2022-08-17 22:01:58 -04:00 committed by tommytran732
parent 2b18682d04
commit 672d558c17
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 060B29EB996BD9F2
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
content/os/Linux-Desktop-Hardening.md → content/os/Desktop-Linux-Hardening.md
View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---
title: "Linux Desktop Hardening"
title: "Desktop Linux Hardening"
date: 2022-08-17
tags: ['operating systems', 'linux', 'privacy', 'security']
author: Tommy
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Of course, this is a non-exhaustive list of how different Linux distributions do
### Keystroke Anonymization
You could be [fingerprinted based on soft biometric traits](https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Keystroke_Deanonymization) when you use the keyboard. The [Kloak](https://github.com/vmonaco/kloak) package could help you mitigate this threat. It is available as a .deb package from [Kicksecure's repository](https://www.kicksecure.com/wiki/Packages_for_Debian_Hosts) and an [AUR package](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kloak-git).
WIth that being said, if your threat model calls for using something like Kloak, you are probably better off just using Whonix.
With that being said, if your threat model calls for using something like Kloak, you are probably better off just using Whonix.
## Application Confinement
Some sandboxing solutions for desktop Linux distributions do exist; however, they are not as strict as those found in macOS or ChromeOS. Applications installed from the package manager (`dnf`, `apt`, etc.) typically have **no** sandboxing or confinement whatsoever. Below are a few projects that aim to solve this problem: