From 0da3a7a67b79e8703bb9a5964e173b9a63c272d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: eennoo <53978854+eennoo@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 11:19:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add banking report #368 Signed-off-by: eennoo <53978854+eennoo@users.noreply.github.com> --- .../Banking Applications compatibility with GrapheneOS.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/posts/android/Banking Applications compatibility with GrapheneOS.md b/content/posts/android/Banking Applications compatibility with GrapheneOS.md index b3adc45..9a3111d 100644 --- a/content/posts/android/Banking Applications compatibility with GrapheneOS.md +++ b/content/posts/android/Banking Applications compatibility with GrapheneOS.md @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ TEST: Test url again after removing the parameters and verify there is no mistak ### Germany - [1822direkt Banking](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.direkt1822.banking) - [Report](https://github.com/PrivSec-dev/banking-apps-compat-report/issues/167) +- [1822TAN+](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.direkt1822.tanplus) - [Report](https://github.com/PrivSec-dev/banking-apps-compat-report/issues/368) - [comdirect](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.comdirect.app) - [Report](https://github.com/PrivSec-dev/banking-apps-compat-report/issues/348) - [comdirect photoTAN App](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.comdirect.phototan) - [Report](https://github.com/PrivSec-dev/banking-apps-compat-report/issues/349) - [Commerzbank Banking](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.commerzbanking.mobil) - [Report](https://github.com/PrivSec-dev/banking-apps-compat-report/issues/22) @@ -560,4 +561,4 @@ GrapheneOS has a [detailed guide](https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-co > GrapheneOS users are strongly encouraged to share this documentation with app developers enforcing only being able to use the stock OS. Send an email to the developers and leave a review of the app with a link to this information. Share it with other users and create pressure to support GrapheneOS rather than locking users into the stock OS without a valid security reason. GrapheneOS not only upholds the app security model but substantially reinforces it, so it cannot be justified with reasoning based on security, anti-fraud, etc. Please read https://github.com/PrivSec-dev/banking-apps-compat-report/issues/342 -[Twitter](https://twitter.com/GrapheneOS/status/1730491676760633426) / [Nitter](https://nitter.cz/GrapheneOS/status/1730491676760633426) | [Mastodon](https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/111504057316755618) | [Bluesky](https://bsky.app/profile/grapheneos.org/post/3kfhrujfcih2m) \ No newline at end of file +[Twitter](https://twitter.com/GrapheneOS/status/1730491676760633426) / [Nitter](https://nitter.cz/GrapheneOS/status/1730491676760633426) | [Mastodon](https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/111504057316755618) | [Bluesky](https://bsky.app/profile/grapheneos.org/post/3kfhrujfcih2m)